[Dhsvm-users] The result of DHSVM model

[Ed Salminen]

I have certainly seen much worse results than that! I would start with 
your climate forcings and soil parameter values. Are you using station 
data for climate?

On 4/26/2023 3:59 AM, 2330152080 wrote:

>

> Hello:

>

> I am using the DHSVM model to simulate watershed runoff, but the 

> results are relatively poor now. I adjusted some parameters that are 

> acknowledged to be sensitive to the model results, but the results are 

> still poor.The results are shown in the figure below. The orange solid 

> line is the simulated value and the blue is the measured value.The 

> fluctuation of simulation results is small, which can not capture the 

> peak runoff well.

>

> I hope you can give me some advice. Thank you very much. If you need 

> more information, please let me know.

>

> Thank you very much for your time,

>

> Shutao Wang

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Dhsvm-users mailing list

> Dhsvm-users at u.washington.edu

> http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/dhsvm-users


-- 
Ed Salminen, Hydrologist
Watershed Professionals Network LLC
PO Box 8 | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041
(541) 490-6644
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/pipermail/dhsvm-users/attachments/20230427/a5256ceb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 5D885F5E at 6EBB224F.0A044964.png.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 84511 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/pipermail/dhsvm-users/attachments/20230427/a5256ceb/attachment.jpg>